Tesla Cybertruck Hit with Bizarre 'Fascist Car' Ticket

Offers perspective on design, driving culture and policy. Daily driver: Honda Civic Type R (manual).
In a peculiar incident that has quickly garnered widespread attention, a Tesla Cybertruck parked at Stanford Shopping Center in California was issued with a 'fake citation' accusing the driver of operating a 'fascist car.' The note, which criticized Tesla CEO Elon Musk in colorful terms, has sparked debate about the effectiveness and appropriateness of such protest methods.
The incident took place at a popular shopping center, where the futuristic design of Tesla's Cybertruck already draws plenty of attention. However, this particular vehicle attracted a different kind of notice when someone left a piece of paper under its wiper. The so-called citation condemned the vehicle as a 'fascist car' and suggested that the driver should consider more eco-friendly modes of transport like buses or bicycles. Additionally, the note took a harsh stance against Musk, labeling him a 'chainsaw-wielding Nazi billionaire.' The irony was not lost on many observers who pointed out that Tesla vehicles are designed to reduce emissions and contribute positively to environmental sustainability.
Ryan Torres, a Tesla staff program manager, shared the citation on social media platform X, where it quickly went viral. Many users were quick to criticize the protestor’s method, describing it as ineffective and counterproductive. Torres himself highlighted the irony in the citation's claims, pointing out that Tesla currently employs over 140,000 Americans and that SpaceX, another Musk-led venture, has been pivotal in advancing the United States' position in space exploration. The message behind the citation was clear, but its delivery appeared to miss the mark, drawing more ridicule than support.
This isn't the first time Tesla has been at the center of controversial protests. The electric vehicle company and its CEO have often been targeted by activists and critics, sometimes in more aggressive ways. Earlier this year, there were reports of vandalism and even firebombing at Tesla stores. While these fake tickets are less destructive, they still signify a broader discontent among certain groups with Musk's leadership style and public persona. However, the effectiveness of such methods remains highly questionable.
The Cybertruck incident exemplifies what some are calling 'performative protest,' where the style of the protest overshadows its substance. Critics argue that these actions do little to address or solve underlying issues and instead serve as a spectacle. Furthermore, Tesla's role in bolstering the U.S. economy, particularly through job creation and advancements in clean technology, challenges the narrative that the company is detrimental to society. For many supporters, Tesla represents innovation and progress, counterpoints that the protestor's message failed to acknowledge.
As conversations about the role of major tech companies in society continue, this incident serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in public perceptions of innovation leaders like Elon Musk. While the protestor's intentions may have been to criticize, the execution highlighted a lack of understanding about Tesla's wider impact. As the landscape of protest evolves, so too does the need for more thoughtful engagement with the issues at hand, rather than resorting to easily dismissed theatrics.

About Graham Ellis
Offers perspective on design, driving culture and policy. Daily driver: Honda Civic Type R (manual).