Comparison Test: 2025 Mazda CX-30 vs. 2025 Hyundai Kona

The 2025 Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona both offer a range of configurations to suit different preferences. The Mazda CX-30, in its Carbon Turbo trim, features a 250-horsepower turbocharged 2.5-liter engine paired with a six-speed automatic transmission and all-wheel drive—standard across the lineup. This setup is designed to provide a more spirited driving experience, although it comes at a price of $35,220. The Hyundai Kona, on the other hand, comes with a 190-horsepower turbocharged 1.6-liter engine in its Limited AWD variant, priced at $35,335. It offers front-wheel drive as standard, with all-wheel drive available, and even includes an electric version for eco-conscious consumers. While both vehicles are priced similarly, the choice often boils down to what you prioritize in a subcompact SUV.

Despite their similar dimensions, the Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona fill their space differently. The Mazda presents itself with a sleek, hatchback-like silhouette, emphasizing its sporty nature. Inside, it impresses with high-quality materials and a design that borders on luxury, featuring Terracotta leatherette seats and a faux-suede dashboard. However, the sloping roofline compromises rear headroom, making it less suitable for taller passengers. In contrast, the Hyundai Kona adopts a more traditional SUV stance with a futuristic twist. Its interior, although not as luxurious as the Mazda's, offers a roomy rear seat with ample headroom and the ability to comfortably accommodate three adults side-by-side, making it the more practical choice for passengers.

When it comes to technology, the Hyundai Kona takes a leap forward with its dual 12.3-inch screens that provide a modern, integrated infotainment and instrument cluster experience. In comparison, the Mazda CX-30's 10.3-inch screen, controlled by a rotary dial, feels outdated and less intuitive. The Kona also excels with physical controls for climate and media, which many drivers find more convenient than digital interfaces. Despite this, the CX-30's infotainment system holds its own with a straightforward navigation upgrade option. The choice between the two may depend on whether you prioritize cutting-edge technology over a more classic, tactile driving experience.

Performance-wise, the Mazda CX-30 shines with its robust turbo engine, providing a responsive and engaging drive. It accelerates from 0 to 60 mph in just 6.2 seconds, showcasing its sporty credentials. The Hyundai Kona, while slower at 7.6 seconds for the same sprint, offers a comfortable ride with its softer suspension, making it well-suited for everyday commuting. The CX-30's handling is precise, with well-weighted steering that makes it a joy to drive on winding roads. However, its firmer suspension does mean a less forgiving ride over rough surfaces. Conversely, the Kona's ride comfort is better for long journeys, although it sacrifices some handling sharpness.

In terms of fuel efficiency and practicality, the Mazda CX-30 takes the lead with an impressive 37 mpg in highway conditions, outperforming the Kona's 35 mpg. This efficiency is notable given the Mazda's more powerful engine. Cargo space is another area where the Kona edges out slightly, particularly with the rear seats folded, offering more room for luggage. Both vehicles manage to fit seven carry-on suitcases with the seats up, but the Kona accommodates 21 suitcases with them down, compared to the CX-30's 17. This makes the Kona a better choice for those who frequently need to haul larger loads.

Ultimately, the decision between the Mazda CX-30 and Hyundai Kona comes down to what you value most in a subcompact SUV. The Mazda CX-30 appeals to those who prioritize driving engagement and a luxurious interior, even if it means sacrificing some practicality. The Hyundai Kona, with its advanced technology and spaciousness, caters to those who need a more versatile and user-friendly vehicle. Both vehicles offer compelling packages, but the CX-30's dynamic driving experience and upscale feel make it the more emotional choice, while the Kona remains a sensible, tech-savvy option.